The tragedies of marine towns
On monday a study by the Convention on Biological Diversity in collaboration with the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre was released (->press release). The study with the title “Scientific Synthesis of the Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Biodiversity” is a survey on the current results in the investigation of ocean acidity. It is thus a follow-up study to studies initiated e.g. by the global network of science academies (see IAP statement on ocean acidification ) or like the ones which led to the Monaco Declaration.
A main message of these studies and statements is that Carbondioxide i.e CO2 (a major greenhouse gas) has increasingly been taken up by the worlds oceans and thus reduced the effects caused by an increased CO2 level in the athmosphere like e.g. the greenhouse effect. This may on the first sight sound good to climate sceptics since it means that there are processes which act naturally against higher CO2 levels. Unfortunately there are now plenty of measurements which indicate that the uptake of CO2 has been slowing down in the last years, i.e. that it seems that a kind of saturation has been partially/will be reached soon. Due to this the
accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere may accelerate rather soon.
A second main message/problem with this uptake of CO2 is ocean acidification. If CO2 reacts with water this gives carbonic acid , which dissolves mostly to HCO3- and hydrogen ions H+. Thus after CO2 has been taken up by the ocean waters it will give to a smaller amount carbonic acid H2CO3 and carbonate ions CO3^2- and for the most part bicarbonite ions HCO3-. The hydrogen ions decrease the PH level – (you may sometimes find information of PH levels on your liquid soap) that is – the PH gives an indication of the concentration of hydrogen ions H+ via the concentration of Hydronium and it is thus a measure of the acidity or basicity of a solution.
Furthermore the carbonate ions CO3^2- form together with H+ again bicarbonate HCO3-. A higher concentration of H+ (“the acidity”) thus decreases the availablity of carbonate. But carbonate is necessary for producing calcium carbonate (CaCO3) which is essential for shell formation in marines organisms such as corals, shellfish and marine plankton. In other words the increasing acidification of the oceans is harmful to a lot of marine creatures. Since this process is very fast and the fast increasing acidification is clearly measurable this will lead to a rapid change in the composition of the oceans with more or less forseeable consequences. In particular it is very likely that this will have an impact on fish consumption.
update addition Jan, 28. 2017:
Here is more on how the composition of oceans may change, which indicates that at least some of the marine creatures which build shells might still keep their ability to create shells despite increasing acidification. There is a new study:
Proton pumping accompanies calcification in foraminifera (via wattsupwiththat.com) which indicates that amongst others a species called perforate foraminifera Ammonia sp. seems to be able to do so and the amount of perforate foraminifera is not too small:
“A large portion of open ocean calcium carbonate production, between 20 and 50%, derives from perforate foraminifera. Despite its clear importance for the global carbon cycle, the physiological processes responsible for calcification in foraminifera are poorly understood. The key to understanding foraminiferal calcification centres on the relation between carbon speciation in seawater and preferential uptake of these chemical species (CO2, bicarbonate and/or carbonate ions)”
The mechanism is roughly the following. Foraminifera are massively pumping protons (i.e. H+) into their local environment and so make the surrounding waters even more acidic (i.e. lower PH values). This however means that on average less CO2 is dissolved in water, i.e. some of the protons will recombine with HCO3- to H2O and CO2:
Karbonatsystem_Meerwasser_de.svg by Wikipedia User:BeAr, public domain
It seems an enzym called V-type H+ ATPase is responsible for the proton pumping.
While the protons are pushed out, there is an “inside” location in the forminifer (the socalled site of calcification (SOC)) which is less acidic and so shell formation can take place. For this the CO2 is “sucked into the foraminifer”, i.e.: “As CO2 diffuses easily across cell membranes compared to HCO3−, the large pCO2 gradient results in a flux of carbon dioxide into the foraminifer.” And so shell formation can take place at the SOC via the in the blogpost described process.
How acidic is the corresponding pumped microenvironment? The researchers write:
The foreseen reduction in pH (from 8.1 today to ∼7.8 at the end of the twenty-first century36) by increased oceanic CO2 uptake is relatively small compared with the pH decrease in the foraminiferal microenvironment (down to 6.9 in Fig. 1) during calcification.
and so
Hence, a relatively moderate decrease in pH may not impair foraminiferal calcification, especially as DIC increases at the same time. Ocean acidification may still affect calcification indirectly (for example, through altered metabolism).
where DIC is “dissolved inorganic carbon” i.e. all those bi,di, etc. carbonates.
Hence in the abstract they conclude:
…total dissolved CO2 may not reduce calcification, thereby potentially maintaining the current global marine carbonate production.
which I find a bit too optimistic in view that only between 20 and 50% calcium carbonate production derives from perforate foraminifera and not much is known about the other species apart from the fact that some seem definitely not able to maintain shell formation:
Results from culturing experiments mimicking ocean acidification showed contrasting responses of calcification: calcification was reduced in some species, whereas others were not affected.
Moreover the proton pumping mechanism may not work if acidification levels lower beyond 6.9.
July 26th, 2017 at 9:54 pm
Hand care is very important.
Does this starfish crab helps against age spots? Here is what people usually do:
From the New York times article:
The Fountain of Youth at Your Fingertips
June 20th, 2018 at 4:01 am
I often visit your blog and have noticed that you don’t
update it often. More frequent updates will give your site higher rank & authority in google.
I know that writing content takes a lot of time, but you can always help yourself with
miftolo’s tools which will shorten the time of creating an article to a couple of
seconds.
August 3rd, 2019 at 10:52 am
@ReinaldoJuicy
As far as I saw, when you posted your comment, with those “miftolo tools” you could generate texts with an AI.
The randform blog posts have sofar been written solely by humans (mostly me). As explained in the about this blog is amongst others a kind of research project into human perception and cognition.
There had been some posts -notably some of the climate posts- which contents might apriori be interesting for a larger audience, but since they are so preliminary in their scientific outline I prefer to keep them in scientific language so that they are hopefully understood by an audience which is able to process them in an appropriate manner.
So, even if I hope that the work, which went into the blog and the blog’s findings may not be in vain, I am not interested in directly addressing a large audience with this blog.
In fact I stopped writing posts and I wrote already that I rather intend to close the blog. The comment section is still open, but I can’t spend too much time with comments, moreover I feel rather unable to process them in the beat saber mode, which is necessary for a larger audience.
So thanks for your suggestion but I am not interested in using miftolo tools for this blog.
November 2nd, 2019 at 10:20 am
Oh my. You don’t need to write long posts. Who reads those anyways? You could at least keep up reporting about Tim and yours activities. Like Tim had just organized a major puzzle hunt which was even mentioned in an article at the highly-respected german newspaper “Süddeutsche Zeitung.”
November 6th, 2019 at 8:24 am
Relax and
Party Like It’s 1923!