about competition, part IV
Just a little supplement to the last post. It may be interesting to think about the following:
Imagine there are three people on a boat being in an emergency situation. One person has lost all his food, the other two still have all their food. The two who still have their food are in a quarrel about which route to take. Donating a quarter of the food would impair your strength and power to a great amount. Regardless which of the two proposed routes one takes – for either route it is assumed that by donating one half of your food you could in principle survive, but only if everything goes all right.
Imagine the same situation but instead of two quarreling competitors with food you have just one person with food.
Do you think the actions taken with regard to sharing food would be the same in both cases?